CEGEP Calculus I — Differentiation Rules Worksheet
Once the definition of the derivative has been survived, the rules arrive quickly, and the difficulty stops being the limit and becomes the choice: which rule, in which order, and what has to be rewritten before any rule applies at all. This set walks that sequence — the basic formulas, the product rule, the quotient rule, the chain rule, implicit differentiation, higher-order derivatives, and then a question that needs several of them at once. Read it on this page, then print the free PDF when you want room to write.
Practice worksheet — free PDF
No email, no account, no watermark. Teachers: photocopy it for your classes freely. Worked solutions and 6 harder problems come with the CEGEP Calculus I bundle.
All 7 questions
Each question targets one named concept from the sheet. Read them here, or print the PDF — it has working space under each one.
-
Q1Basic Differentiation Formulas
Differentiate each function. Rewrite first where that avoids a rule you have not needed yet, and state any restriction on the domain.
-
Q2The Product Rule
Let .
- Find using the product rule, and simplify.
- Expand first and differentiate the resulting polynomial. Confirm that the two answers agree.
-
Q3The Quotient Rule
Let .
- Find and simplify the numerator.
- Find the equation of the tangent line to at .
-
Q4The Chain Rule
Differentiate, simplifying where a common factor allows it.
- (state the set on which exists)
-
Q5Implicit Differentiation
The curve has equation .
- Verify that the point lies on .
- Find in terms of and .
- Find the equation of the tangent to at .
-
Q6Higher-Order Derivatives
An ore trolley runs on a straight track. Its position, in metres from a marker on the track, is modelled by for , with in seconds.
- Find the velocity and the acceleration , with units.
- Find the time at which the acceleration is zero, and state what is happening to the velocity at that instant.
- A student says “the acceleration is zero at that time, so the trolley is momentarily at rest”. Explain why this is wrong, and give the times in at which the trolley really is at rest.
-
Q7Synthesis — drawing on several topics in this set
A directional antenna sits at the top of a mast, m above level ground. A receiver placed on the ground at a horizontal distance of metres from the foot of the mast reports a normalised line-of-sight reading — the horizontal separation divided by the straight-line separation — modelled by
- Find using the quotient rule together with the chain rule, and simplify to a single term.
- Evaluate to three decimal places, with units.
- Obtain a second way, by writing and using the product rule. Then use the sign of to describe how the reading behaves as increases.
The 6 challenge problems for this topic are a separate, paid sheet and are not reproduced here.
Which stream is this for? This is CEGEP Calculus I — 201-NYA-05 under the legacy numbering, 201-SN2-RE under the current one, the differential calculus course in the Sciences de la nature programme. It is written against competency 0M02, whose content list for this block is exactly the usual rules of differentiation (sum, difference, scalar multiple, product, quotient), successive derivatives, the chain rule and implicit differentiation — which is what you will find here and nothing else. Derivatives of the transcendental functions, e to the x, ln x and the trigonometric functions, are the next worksheet in the sequence, not this one; if you are hunting for them, that is why they are absent rather than overlooked. Antiderivatives, substitution and differential equations sit under competency 0M03 and belong to Calculus II.
How to do every concept on this sheet
This is the part worksheet sites usually leave out. Below is the actual reasoning behind each group of questions — not a full solution set, the decisions that get you to one. Read it before you start, or after you get stuck.
Why the early questions look easier than your textbook's
The sheets are ordered so that nothing before The Chain Rule needs a composition, and nothing before The Quotient Rule needs a quotient. That is deliberate, and it is worth knowing, because a textbook chapter is usually written the other way round: every exercise set assumes every rule in the chapter. Here Q1 can be done with the power rule alone, Q2 needs the product rule and nothing after it, and so on down the page.
The practical consequence is that if you find yourself reaching for a rule from a later question, you have almost certainly missed a rewrite. A quotient with a single power in the denominator is a sum of powers. A radical is a fractional exponent. The rule you were about to use will still give the right answer, but it will take four times as long and carry four times the chance of a sign error.
Q1 — rewrite first, then differentiate
The power rule differentiates xn to n·xn−1 for every real n, not only for whole numbers — but only once the expression is actually written as a power. Q1 gives you three functions that are each one algebraic step away from being a sum of powers.
(xn)′ = n·xn−1 √x = x1⁄2 1⁄x3 = x−3The sign on a negative exponent. Differentiating a term like 4x−3 multiplies 4 by −3 and drops the exponent to −4. Two things change at once, and doing only one of them is the single most common slip in this question.
The restriction survives the rewriting. Q1 asks you to state any restriction on the domain, and it asks because a rewrite can hide one. Dividing a polynomial through by x2 produces an expression that looks defined everywhere, but the function you started with was not defined at 0 and neither is its derivative. The two expressions agree on the domain, not off it.
Q2 — the product rule is not the product of the derivatives
Worth saying flatly, because it is the wrong instinct almost everyone has once. The derivative of a product has two terms:
(uv)′ = u′v + uv′Q2 is built so you can prove this to yourself rather than take it on trust. Part (a) applies the rule; part (b) expands the product into an ordinary polynomial and differentiates that instead. Two routes, one function, so the answers must agree — and if you also compute u′v′ you can watch it fail to match either of them. That is a more convincing demonstration than any assertion on this page.
Keep the check in your habits after Q2, because it is free whenever both factors are polynomials. It stops being available the moment one factor is a function you cannot expand — a root, or later a transcendental — which is precisely when the product rule stops being a convenience and becomes the only way through.
Q3 — the quotient rule, and the order that is not symmetric
Swapping the two products in the product rule changes nothing, because addition commutes. Swapping them in the quotient rule negates your entire answer, because subtraction does not.
(u⁄v)′ = (u′v − uv′) ⁄ v²A slope that comes out with the wrong sign is nearly always this, not arithmetic. Say the order aloud as you write it: the derivative of the top times the bottom comes first, then minus the top times the derivative of the bottom, all over the bottom squared. Then distribute that minus sign across every term of the second product, not just the first one.
Q3 then asks for a tangent line, which needs two numbers and not one: the slope f′(1) and the point f(1). Write it in point-slope form, y − f(a) = f′(a)(x − a), before simplifying. Two habits pay off here. Simplify the numerator and leave the denominator factored — later questions ask where f′ = 0, and only the numerator can answer that, since a fraction vanishes only where its top does. And sanity-check the sign of your slope against the function itself: evaluate f a little to each side of the point, see whether it is rising or falling, and compare.
Q4 — the chain rule, and where the derivative stops existing
A composite is differentiated from the outside in: the derivative of the outer function, evaluated at the inner function left untouched, multiplied by the derivative of the inner function.
(f ∘ g)′(x) = f′(g(x))·g′(x) dy⁄dx = (dy⁄du)(du⁄dx)Naming u out loud is not beneath you. The error that costs marks is differentiating the outer function and the inner one in the same breath — writing 4u3·u′ but replacing u by something already differentiated. Write u = (the inside), write u′ separately, then substitute. Three short lines beat one long one you cannot check.
Q4(b) attaches a second question to the derivative: state the set on which g′ exists. This is not decoration. Differentiating a square root sends the inside into a denominator, so the derivative can fail to exist at points where the function itself is perfectly well defined — the endpoints of a closed domain are the usual casualties. The domain of f′ is a subset of the domain of f, never the other way round, and it is not automatically the same set. Give it in standard interval notation.
Q5 — implicit differentiation, and what dy⁄dx is doing there
When a curve is given by an equation in x and y that you cannot or would rather not solve for y, you differentiate the whole equation with respect to x and treat y as a function of x throughout. Every y that gets differentiated leaves a dy⁄dx behind; that is the chain rule, applied to a function whose formula you never wrote down.
Implicit differentiation, in the order that works
Q5 is the pattern in its cleanest form — a mixed term, a squared term, a constant. Every implicit question you meet later is this, with more terms.
- 1Differentiate both sides with respect to x
A term in x alone behaves normally. A term in y alone needs the chain rule and produces a dy⁄dx factor. A term containing both — like 3xy — needs the product rule and then the chain rule on its y half.
- 2Collect every dy⁄dx on one side
Move everything else across, then factor dy⁄dx out. The equation is linear in dy⁄dx, always — that is why this method works at all, and it is worth noticing rather than discovering by accident.
- 3Divide, and state when you may
The answer is a fraction in x and y, and whatever makes its denominator zero has to be excluded. That excluded set is not a nuisance; it is exactly where the curve has a vertical tangent.
- 4Substitute the point last
Both coordinates go in, because dy⁄dx depends on x and y. This is also why Q5(a) asks you to verify the point lies on the curve first: a point off the curve produces a number that means nothing.
Do not solve for y first, even when you could. On the curve in Q5 that would mean the quadratic formula, a square root, and then a chain rule on that root — three chances to go wrong in place of one line of algebra. Implicit differentiation is the shorter route even when the explicit one exists.
Q6 — higher-order derivatives, and the sentence people get backwards
Differentiating again gives the second derivative, written f″(x) or d²y⁄dx². In motion the chain is short, and worth holding as words rather than symbols: position, then velocity, then acceleration.
s(t) → v(t) = s′(t) → a(t) = v′(t) = s″(t)Zero acceleration does not mean at rest. "At rest" is a statement about v, the first derivative: the object is not moving. a = 0 is a statement about the second: the velocity is not changing. Something can be moving quickly with zero acceleration, and Q6 is built on exactly that confusion — part (c) hands you a student who has made it and asks you to say precisely what is wrong.
Explaining a mistake is a different task from getting an answer right, and it is marked differently. Name which derivative each claim is about, then supply the correct statement. "It is wrong" is not an explanation.
Units carry down the chain as well, and Q6(a) asks for them. If position is in metres and time in seconds, velocity is metres per second and acceleration metres per second squared. Each differentiation divides by one more unit of the input variable — a rule that keeps working long after this question, in every rate you interpret.
Q7 — when several rules meet in one function
The closing question is the realistic one: a quotient whose denominator is a composite, so the chain rule runs inside the quotient rule. Nothing new is being tested, only whether you can keep two rules straight at the same time.
There is usually more than one correct route, and they are not equally painful. Q7 makes you take two of them on purpose: once as a quotient, and once after rewriting the denominator as a negative power, which turns the same function into a product. Both are valid; the point of doing both is that they must agree, which makes the second computation a complete check on the first. Once you have seen how much shorter one route is, the habit you want is to look for the rewrite before committing.
Q7 also asks what the sign of R′ says about the reading as the distance grows. That is the step students skip, and it is where the marks for interpretation live. A derivative positive throughout the domain means the quantity is strictly increasing — a sentence about the physical situation, not about the algebra. The numerical value is wanted to three decimal places and with units; a bare number answers a different question from the one asked.
Getting the most out of it
Choose the rule before you compute anything
Look at the function as a whole first and name its outermost structure: is it a sum, a product, a quotient, or a composite? That name decides the first line of your work. Most lost marks in this set are not arithmetic; they are a product rule applied to a composite, or a quotient rule applied to something that was a sum of powers all along.
Rewrite anything that will simplify
Fractional and negative exponents, cancelling a common factor, dividing through by a single term in the denominator — each of these can remove a whole rule from the calculation. A step you never take is a step you cannot get wrong.
Check by a second route
A product of polynomials can be expanded and differentiated instead. A quotient can be rewritten as a product with a negative exponent. An implicit result can be tested at a known point on the curve. Q2 and Q7 build the check into the question; do it on the others too, and the sign errors that are otherwise invisible stop reaching your final answer.
Answer the whole question
Domain restrictions, units, interval notation, the sentence of interpretation, the reason a claim is false — these are separate marks from the derivative itself, and they are the cheapest ones on any paper. They are also the ones most often left blank.
Want the solutions, or something more challenging?
The worksheet, the questions above and every explanation on this page stay free permanently. Three more PDFs exist for this topic — the worked answer key, a harder problem set, and the answer key to that. They come with the CEGEP Calculus I Solutions Bundle, which is what keeps the rest of the series free.
What else exists for Differentiation Rules
Three PDFs · 12 pages · all three are in the bundle below.
- Answer key — 3 pages. All 7 questions worked step by step, including the restrictions and the justifications. Not a list of final answers.
- Challenge problems — 6 pages, 6 problems. A separate sheet at exam-plus difficulty covering the same 6 concepts. Harder than anything on the free sheet.
- Challenge answer key — 3 pages. Every challenge problem worked to the same standard, with the checks shown.
- PDF, letter size, print-ready.
The one thing that's for sale
Every CEGEP Calculus I topic — the complete Solutions Bundle
One download, one payment, the whole program. Every answer key and every challenge set for all 8 CEGEP Calculus I worksheet sets — including this one.
- Worked solutions, not answer lists — every step written out
- Covers the whole year's program at this level
- Less than the price of one hour of tutoring — for the entire year's solutions
Taking Secondary 1 Math as well? The Secondary 1 Math bundle covers all 15 of its sets — 45 PDFs, 182 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 2 Math as well? The Secondary 2 Math bundle covers all 14 of its sets — 42 PDFs, 181 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 3 Math as well? The Secondary 3 Math bundle covers all 11 of its sets — 33 PDFs, 154 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 4 Math as well? The Secondary 4 Math bundle covers all 17 of its sets — 51 PDFs, 154 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 5 Math as well? The Secondary 5 Math bundle covers all 21 of its sets — 63 PDFs, 228 pages — on the same terms.
Taking CEGEP Calculus II as well? The CEGEP Calculus II bundle covers all 8 of its sets — 24 PDFs, 90 pages — on the same terms.
Taking CEGEP Linear Algebra as well? The CEGEP Linear Algebra bundle covers all 7 of its sets — 21 PDFs, 82 pages — on the same terms.
Taking AP Calculus AB as well? The AP Calculus AB bundle covers all 8 of its sets — 24 PDFs, 126 pages — on the same terms.
Common questions
Is this worksheet really free?
Yes — the questions are on this page to read, and the PDF downloads directly, no email and no account. The one paid item is optional: the complete CEGEP Calculus I Solutions Bundle, which covers every set at this level.
Is this for 201-NYA-05 or 201-SN2-RE?
Both — they are the same course under two numbering systems. 201-NYA-05 is the legacy code and 201-SN2-RE the current one, and your college may use either. The content is set by competency 0M02 of the Sciences de la nature programme, which is what this worksheet is written against.
Why are there no derivatives of e^x, ln x or sin x here?
Because they come later in the course. This set covers the algebraic rules — sum, difference, scalar multiple, product, quotient, chain, implicit, and successive derivatives — applied to polynomials, roots and rational functions. Derivatives of the transcendental functions are the next worksheet, and they need every rule on this one before they make sense.
Do I need the chain rule for the first questions?
No. The sheets are ordered so that nothing before The Chain Rule requires a composition, and nothing before The Quotient Rule requires a quotient. If you find yourself needing a later rule on an early question, look for an algebraic rewrite you have missed — that is usually what the question is testing.
When should I use implicit differentiation instead of solving for y?
Whenever solving for y is impossible, or possible but ugly. Even when an explicit form exists, isolating y often introduces a square root that then needs the chain rule anyway, so you do more work for the same answer. Differentiate the equation as it stands, collect the dy/dx terms, and factor.
My answer has the opposite sign to the one I expected. What went wrong?
On a quotient, check the order in the numerator: the derivative of the top times the bottom comes first, then minus the top times the derivative of the bottom. Reversing those two gives exactly the negative of the correct derivative, which is why a wrong sign on a quotient is rarely an arithmetic slip. Then check that you distributed the minus sign across the whole second product.
Can teachers use this in class?
Yes. Print and photocopy it for your own classes freely — I just ask that the tutorinmontreal.ca footer stays on the page.
I'm stuck on one question. Can you help?
Yes — through one-on-one tutoring, in Montreal or online. Get in touch to arrange a session, or see the current rates.
← All 8 CEGEP Calculus I worksheets · Secondary 1 Math series (15 sheets) → · Secondary 2 Math series (14 sheets) → · Secondary 3 Math series (11 sheets) → · Secondary 4 Math series (17 sheets) → · Secondary 5 Math series (21 sheets) → · CEGEP Calculus II series (8 sheets) → · CEGEP Linear Algebra series (7 sheets) → · AP Calculus AB series (8 sheets) →