CEGEP Calculus II — Power Series, Taylor and Maclaurin Series Worksheet
The set where a series stops being a number and becomes a function. Reading the centre off the powers, getting the radius from the Ratio Test, finishing the job by testing each endpoint on its own, Taylor and Maclaurin series built from the definition, and then the faster route — taking a series you already know and substituting, multiplying, differentiating or integrating your way to a new one, including a definite integral whose integrand has no elementary antiderivative. Have a look on this page, then print the free PDF when you want to write on it.
Practice worksheet — free PDF
No email, no account, no watermark. Teachers: photocopy it for your classes freely. Worked solutions and 5 harder problems come with the CEGEP Calculus II bundle.
All 7 questions
Each question targets one named concept from the sheet. Read them here, or print the PDF — it has working space under each one.
-
Q1Power Series and the Radius of Convergence
A ski resort models the settling of fresh snow with the power series State the centre of the series, then apply the Ratio Test to determine its radius of convergence. Name the test and show the limit you evaluate.
-
Q2The Interval of Convergence
Determine the interval of convergence of Give the centre and the radius, then test each endpoint separately, naming the test you use at each one.
-
Q3The Maclaurin Series of a Function
Let . Working from the definition — that is, by differentiating and evaluating at — find the first four non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series of . Then give the general term, and state the radius of convergence.
-
Q4Taylor Series Centred at a Point
Find the Taylor series of centred at , expressed with and a general term in . State the centre and the radius of convergence.
-
Q5Building New Series from Known Ones
The geometric series for is known. Without computing any Maclaurin coefficient from repeated derivatives, use substitution, multiplication and term-by-term differentiation to answer the following.
- Find the Maclaurin series of and state its radius of convergence.
- Differentiate the geometric series term by term to obtain a series for , and use it to evaluate .
-
Q6Evaluating an Integral with a Series
The function has no elementary antiderivative, so cannot be found by the Fundamental Theorem alone.
- Starting from the Maclaurin series of , write the integral as an infinite series with a general term.
- The series alternates. Use the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem to find how many terms guarantee an error smaller than , and give the value of the integral to three decimal places.
-
Q7Synthesis — drawing on several topics in this set
This question builds a well-known series from the geometric one and then uses it numerically.
- Substitute into to obtain the Maclaurin series of , and state its radius.
- Integrate term by term to obtain the Maclaurin series of , justifying the value of the constant of integration.
- Find the interval of convergence of the series in (b), testing both endpoints separately.
- Use the series to approximate to three decimal places, and say how you know the error is small enough.
The 5 challenge problems for this topic are a separate, paid sheet and are not reproduced here.
Which stream is this for? This is CEGEP Calculus II — 201-NYB-05 under the legacy numbering, 201-SN3-RE under the current one — covering the power-series part of competency 0M03, which the ministerial devis names explicitly, alongside integration by means of a Maclaurin series. It assumes the convergence tests rather than teaching them: the integral, comparison, limit comparison, ratio, root and alternating series tests, and the difference between absolute and conditional convergence, are the previous worksheet in this course, Sequences and Series. If an endpoint here leaves you unsure which test to reach for, that is the set to go back to.
How to do every concept on this sheet
This is the part worksheet sites usually leave out. Below is the actual reasoning behind each group of questions — not a full solution set, the decisions that get you to one. Read it before you start, or after you get stuck.
The Ratio Test gives you a radius. It does not give you the interval
This is the single distinction the whole set is built around, and it is where most of the marks are lost. Q1 asks only for the centre and the radius of convergence, and the Ratio Test settles it in one limit. Q2 asks for the interval of convergence, and the same limit gets you most of the way and then stops dead.
|x − a| < R → converges absolutely |x − a| > R → diverges |x − a| = R → the Ratio Test says nothing at allAt the two endpoints the ratio limit equals exactly 1, which is the one value the test declares itself inconclusive on. So the endpoints are not hard cases of the Ratio Test; they are outside its reach entirely, and each has to be substituted back into the original series and judged on its own merits.
Both endpoints, separately, and they are allowed to disagree. Nothing makes the two ends of an interval behave alike — the substitution puts a positive quantity at one end and an alternating one at the other, so one end can converge while the other diverges, and one can converge conditionally while the other converges absolutely. That is exactly what Q2 is testing when it says "test each endpoint separately, naming the test you use at each one". A student who reports the open interval has done the Ratio Test correctly, done four-fifths of the work, and still not answered the question that was asked.
Finishing an interval of convergence
Q2 is the drill for this. Five steps, and the last three are the ones people skip.
- 1Ratio Test on the general term
Form the limit of |an+1/an|. Everything that is not a power of (x − a) collapses to a constant, and what survives is a multiple of |x − a|.
- 2Set that limit below 1 and solve
You get |x − a| < R. Read the centre a and the radius R straight off it, and write them down as named quantities — a marker is looking for both words.
- 3Substitute the left endpoint into the original series
Not into the ratio limit — into the series. The powers of the base collapse against the geometric factor and what is left is an ordinary numerical series. Identify it, name a test, apply it.
- 4Substitute the right endpoint, and start again
A second, independent question. The test that settled the other end may be useless here; expect to change tests, and say which one you changed to.
- 5Write the interval with the brackets that record your two verdicts
A square bracket where the endpoint converged, a round one where it did not. The brackets are the answer — they are the only place the endpoint work shows up.
Read the centre off the powers literally. The standard form is (x − a)n, so a plus sign inside the bracket is a negative centre, and Q1 opens with a plus sign for that reason. Getting the sign wrong shifts the whole interval and every endpoint with it, and nothing downstream will flag it.
The factor that the Ratio Test ignores is the factor that decides the endpoints. In Q1 and Q2 the general term carries something mild alongside the geometric part — a root of n, a plain n. In the ratio those factors tend to 1 and change the radius not at all. Substitute an endpoint, though, and the geometric part is exactly what cancels, leaving that mild factor alone in charge of the answer. It is worth noticing that the two questions are asking about different pieces of the same expression.
Taylor and Maclaurin from the definition
Q3 and Q4 are the same machine run at two different centres, and both say to work from the definition: differentiate repeatedly, evaluate at the centre, divide by n!.
f(x) = Σ (n = 0 to ∞) [ f⁽ⁿ⁾(a) / n! ] (x − a)ⁿ Maclaurin is this with a = 0Q3 takes a logarithm at the centre 0 and asks for the first four non-zero terms, then the general term, then the radius. Q4 takes a rational function at a centre away from 0 and asks for the general term directly in powers of (x − 2). A Maclaurin series is not a different object from a Taylor series; it is the case a = 0, which is why Q4 is harder in exactly one respect — the powers stay in terms of (x − 2) throughout.
Three ways these go wrong. The coefficient is f⁽ⁿ⁾(a) divided by n!, and dropping the factorial is the commonest slip on the page. Expanding (x − a)n into powers of x destroys the entire point of centring the series where you centred it. And "the general term" means a formula in n that reproduces every coefficient, sign included — the first four terms followed by dots is not it, and finding the pattern is where the marks are. Test the formula by putting n = 2 and n = 4 into it and checking against the derivatives you already computed.
There is a free check on the radius in both questions. A Taylor series centred at a cannot converge past the nearest point where the function itself breaks down — a zero denominator, the edge of a logarithm's domain. Measure that distance from the centre and compare it with the radius your Ratio Test produced. If they disagree, one of them is wrong, and it is usually the algebra.
Build from a series you already have
Q5 forbids repeated derivatives outright: the geometric series is given, and the new series has to come out of it by substitution, multiplication and term-by-term differentiation. That prohibition is the lesson, not an obstacle. Differentiating a quotient four times to guess a pattern is slow and it is where the sign errors live; substituting into a known series is two lines and carries its own convergence condition with it. The devis expects this route, and Q6 and Q7 both depend on it.
The four moves, and what each costs
All four are legitimate strictly inside the radius. Each does something different to the interval.
- 1Substitute
Replace the variable of a known series by an expression — Q5 and Q7 both put a multiple of −x² in for t, and Q6 substitutes into the exponential series. Substitute into the convergence condition as well: |t| < 1 becomes a condition on x, and that is where the new radius comes from.
- 2Multiply by a power of x
Q5 needs a factor of x out front. Multiplying every term shifts the exponents by one and moves nothing else — the radius is untouched.
- 3Differentiate term by term
Q5 differentiates the geometric series to reach a series for 1/(1 − t)², then evaluates a numerical sum with it. The n that comes down from the exponent is what makes the new series useful.
- 4Integrate term by term
Q6 integrates a series to reach an integral with no elementary antiderivative; Q7 integrates one to reach arctan. An integration brings a constant with it — Q7(b) asks you to justify its value, and the justification is to evaluate both sides at the centre, where every power term vanishes.
All four preserve the radius. None of them preserves the endpoints. Term-by-term differentiation brings a factor of n down onto each term, which can cancel an n in a denominator and destroy the very thing that was making an endpoint converge. Term-by-term integration does the reverse, putting an n into a denominator and sometimes creating convergence at an endpoint where there was none. So "the radius is unchanged" is true and "the interval is unchanged" is false, and after any of these moves the endpoints of the new series have to be retested from scratch. Q7(c) asks for exactly that, on the series the integration produced.
Using a series to get a number
Q6 and Q7(d) are the payoff: an integral the Fundamental Theorem cannot reach, and a value you cannot get without a calculator, both handled by summing a few terms and bounding what you threw away.
The Alternating Series Estimation Theorem, stated properly. If the terms alternate in sign, decrease in absolute value and tend to 0, then the error made by stopping is no larger than the first term you omitted. All three hypotheses have to hold, and the bound is the first omitted term, not the last one you kept. Its real value is that it works in advance: list the terms in absolute value, stop at the first one below your tolerance, and you know how many to sum before you sum anything. Q6 states its tolerance explicitly; Q7(d) states it implicitly by asking for three decimal places, which needs the first omitted term below 0.0005.
Q7 is the whole set in one question — substitute into the geometric series, integrate term by term, justify the constant, find the interval of convergence with both endpoints tested, then use the result numerically. If you can do Q7 unaided, you can do this topic.
The tests themselves are the previous worksheet
Once an endpoint is substituted, the x disappears and you are holding a plain numerical series. Nothing in this set will tell you what to do with it — that is Sequences and Series, the previous worksheet in this course, and the p-series, comparison, limit comparison, integral and alternating series tests are all in play here. Absolute against conditional convergence matters too: at an endpoint where the series alternates, "converges" is only half an answer, because whether the convergence is conditional is part of what was asked.
Getting the most out of it
Write the centre and the radius down as named quantities
Two short lines — "centre a = …", "radius R = …" — before you go anywhere near an endpoint. Every question in this set asks for at least one of them explicitly, they are cheap marks, and having them written down is what stops the endpoint substitution going in at the wrong number.
Substitute the endpoint into the original series, not into the ratio
Put the number in, then simplify the powers before you do anything else. The geometric factor cancels against the power of the base, and what is left is nearly always a series you recognise on sight. Half the difficulty at an endpoint is that people try to test it before simplifying it into something recognisable.
Name the test, at each end
"Converges" is not an answer at a CEGEP endpoint; "converges by the Alternating Series Test, since the terms are positive, decreasing and tend to 0" is. Name the test and state the hypotheses you checked. Expect to name a different test at the other end — that is normal, not a sign that you have made a mistake.
Reach for a known series before you differentiate anything
The geometric series and the exponential series between them generate most of what this set asks for, by substitution, multiplication, differentiation or integration. Repeated differentiation is the method of last resort, and the questions that want it say so.
Sanity-check every series you produce
Expand your general term at the first two or three values of n and compare it with the terms you wrote out by hand; check the radius against the distance from the centre to the nearest place the function misbehaves; put a convenient number into a numerical sum and see whether the partial sums are heading where you claimed. These checks cost a minute and catch sign errors that nothing else will.
Want the solutions, or something more challenging?
The worksheet, the questions above and every explanation on this page stay free permanently. Three more PDFs exist for this topic — the worked answer key, a harder problem set, and the answer key to that. They come with the CEGEP Calculus II Solutions Bundle, which is what keeps the rest of the series free.
What else exists for Power Series, Taylor and Maclaurin Series
Three PDFs · 12 pages · all three are in the bundle below.
- Answer key — 4 pages. All 7 questions worked step by step, including the restrictions and the justifications. Not a list of final answers.
- Challenge problems — 5 pages, 5 problems. A separate sheet at exam-plus difficulty covering the same 6 concepts. Harder than anything on the free sheet.
- Challenge answer key — 3 pages. Every challenge problem worked to the same standard, with the checks shown.
- PDF, letter size, print-ready.
The one thing that's for sale
Every CEGEP Calculus II topic — the complete Solutions Bundle
One download, one payment, the whole program. Every answer key and every challenge set for all 8 CEGEP Calculus II worksheet sets — including this one.
- Worked solutions, not answer lists — every step written out
- Covers the whole year's program at this level
- Less than the price of one hour of tutoring — for the entire year's solutions
Taking Secondary 1 Math as well? The Secondary 1 Math bundle covers all 15 of its sets — 45 PDFs, 182 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 2 Math as well? The Secondary 2 Math bundle covers all 14 of its sets — 42 PDFs, 181 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 3 Math as well? The Secondary 3 Math bundle covers all 11 of its sets — 33 PDFs, 154 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 4 Math as well? The Secondary 4 Math bundle covers all 17 of its sets — 51 PDFs, 154 pages — on the same terms.
Taking Secondary 5 Math as well? The Secondary 5 Math bundle covers all 21 of its sets — 63 PDFs, 228 pages — on the same terms.
Taking CEGEP Calculus I as well? The CEGEP Calculus I bundle covers all 8 of its sets — 24 PDFs, 82 pages — on the same terms.
Taking CEGEP Linear Algebra as well? The CEGEP Linear Algebra bundle covers all 7 of its sets — 21 PDFs, 82 pages — on the same terms.
Taking AP Calculus AB as well? The AP Calculus AB bundle covers all 8 of its sets — 24 PDFs, 126 pages — on the same terms.
Common questions
Is this worksheet really free?
Yes — the questions are on this page to read, and the PDF downloads directly, no email and no account. The one paid item is optional: the complete CEGEP Calculus II Solutions Bundle, which covers every set at this level.
Which course is this? I have 201-SN3-RE, not 201-NYB-05.
Both are the same course. 201-NYB-05 is the legacy number and 201-SN3-RE the current one, and the content is fixed by the ministerial competency 0M03 in the Sciences de la nature programme, so the material is the same across colleges whichever number is on your timetable.
Why isn't the interval of convergence just what the Ratio Test gave me?
Because the Ratio Test is inconclusive at the two endpoints — that is exactly where its limit equals 1 — so it never says anything about them. What it gives you is the centre and the radius, and therefore the open interval on which convergence is guaranteed. Whether each endpoint belongs is a separate question, answered by substituting that value into the original series and testing the numerical series you get.
If I've tested one endpoint, do I really have to test the other?
Yes. The two ends are independent and they often disagree: the substitution typically makes one series positive and the other alternating, and an alternating series can converge where its positive counterpart diverges. Convergence at one endpoint tells you nothing whatever about the other.
Which test should I use at an endpoint?
Whichever one the resulting numerical series calls for — a p-series comparison, the comparison or limit comparison test, the integral test, or the alternating series test when the substitution has produced alternating signs. Those tests are the previous worksheet in this course, Sequences and Series; this set assumes them and asks only that you choose correctly and name your choice.
Can I differentiate a power series term by term?
Inside the radius of convergence, yes, and the differentiated series has the same radius. What is not preserved is endpoint behaviour: differentiating brings a factor of n down onto every term, which can cancel a factor in the denominator and turn a convergent endpoint into a divergent one. Integration does the reverse. Either way, retest the endpoints of the new series rather than copying the old interval across.
What is the difference between a Taylor series and a Maclaurin series?
Only the centre. A Maclaurin series is a Taylor series centred at 0. You centre elsewhere when the function or its derivatives misbehave at 0, or when the point you actually care about is far from 0 — a series converges fastest near its centre, so choosing the centre well is what makes a short approximation good enough.
How do I know how many terms to keep in an approximation?
For an alternating series, the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem answers that before you sum anything: the error from stopping is at most the first term you leave out, so list the terms in absolute value and stop at the first one smaller than your tolerance. Three decimal places means the first omitted term must be below 0.0005.
Can teachers use this in class?
Yes. Print and photocopy it for your own classes freely — I just ask that the tutorinmontreal.ca footer stays on the page.
I'm stuck on one question. Can you help?
Yes — through one-on-one tutoring, in Montreal or online. Get in touch to arrange a session, or see the current rates.
← All 8 CEGEP Calculus II worksheets · Secondary 1 Math series (15 sheets) → · Secondary 2 Math series (14 sheets) → · Secondary 3 Math series (11 sheets) → · Secondary 4 Math series (17 sheets) → · Secondary 5 Math series (21 sheets) → · CEGEP Calculus I series (8 sheets) → · CEGEP Linear Algebra series (7 sheets) → · AP Calculus AB series (8 sheets) →